Current:Home > NewsIs $4.3 million the new retirement number? -BeyondWealth Learning
Is $4.3 million the new retirement number?
View
Date:2025-04-27 16:37:13
One of the toughest things about saving for retirement is that it's hard to estimate how much money you'll actually need to cover your senior living costs in full. After all, there are so many factors that will go into that equation, including your retirement age, the state of your health, your desired lifestyle, and inflation, to name only some.
In fact, you'll often hear that it's wise to aim for $1 million in savings because that sum is more likely to be enough to cover your costs throughout your senior years. Or is it?
The reality is that $1 million is an easy, clean number to land on. But for many retirees, it might fall short.
In fact, in a recent New York Life survey, today's workers said it would take an average of $4,342,378.86 in savings to be able to retire comfortably. But given where savers are at today, that sort of balance may be unrealistic.
Do you really need $4.3 million in retirement?
While Americans might think it will take around $4.3 million to retire without financial worries, their current 401(k) and IRA balances tell a much different story. That's because the average saver today only has $135,161.50 socked away.
Granted, it may be possible to grow $135,000 and change into roughly $4.3 million. Let's say you're 31 years old with $135,000 in savings and you want to retire at 67, which is full retirement age for Social Security purposes. If you were to stock away $1,000 a month between now and then at an average annual 8% return, which is a bit below the stock market's average, then you'd get to $4.4 million in time for retirement.
But a lot of people can't part with $12,000 a year for retirement savings purposes. And also, a lot of people who have $135,000 and change in savings are much older than their early 30s. So for a lot of people, getting to the $4.3 million mark isn't so doable.
Of course, it's important to ask the question of whether $4.3 million is really the right number to be aiming for. And the answer is that for some people, it might be.
But again, there's no single retirement savings target that guarantees you financial security throughout your senior years. So rather than fixate on a number that a survey arrives at, a better bet is to do your own number-crunching and planning to come up with a savings goal that's likely to allow you to meet your personal needs.
Remember, someone who wants to spend retirement gardening and spending time with family might need a lot less money than someone intending to retire in a large city and enjoy nightlife all the time. So while it may not be a bad idea for you to aim for $4.3 million in savings, you also shouldn't feel compelled to.
And do keep in mind that while $4.3 million is clearly a lot of money, even that sum doesn't guarantee that you won't run out. If you aren't careful, it's possible to spend down a nest egg of any size too quickly. So no matter what savings number you land on, you should not only work your hardest to attain it, but also, manage your money strategically once retirement does roll around.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $21,756 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $21,756 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
veryGood! (6813)
Related
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Biden pushes on ‘blue wall’ sprint with Michigan trip as he continues to make the case for candidacy
- Republican effort to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in inherent contempt of Congress falls short
- Beastie Boys sue Chili's owner, claiming 'Sabotage' was used without permission
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Bestselling author Brendan DuBois charged with possessing child sexual abuse materials
- Drive a used car? Check your airbag. NHTSA warns against faulty inflators after 3 deaths
- Nordstrom Anniversary Sale 2024: The Best Beauty Exclusive Deals from La Mer, Oribe, NuFACE & More
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Steward Health Care under federal investigation for fraud and corruption, sources tell CBS News
Ranking
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Helicopter carrying 3 people crashes in the ocean off the Hawaiian island of Kauai
- 1-year-old found alive in Louisiana ditch a day after 4-year-old brother was found dead
- Southwest adds flights to handle Taylor Swift hordes for fall Eras Tour shows in the U.S.
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Multiple Chinese warships spotted near Alaska, U.S. Coast Guard says
- IRS says it has clawed back $1 billion from millionaire tax cheats
- All about Hallmark's new streaming service. How much will it cost?
Recommendation
How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
The 15 craziest Nicolas Cage movies, ranked (including 'Longlegs')
Pat Colbert, 'Dallas' and 'Knots Landing' actress, dies at 77: Reports
Ashley Judd: I'm calling on Biden to step aside. Beating Trump is too important.
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Tour de France standings, results: Biniam Girmay sprints to Stage 12 victory
Texas power outage map: Over a million without power days after Beryl
Thousands of Oregon hospital patients may have been exposed to infectious diseases