Current:Home > FinanceNorth Dakota’s abortion ban will remain on hold during court appeal -BeyondWealth Learning
North Dakota’s abortion ban will remain on hold during court appeal
View
Date:2025-04-14 13:25:00
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — North Dakota won’t be allowed to enforce its near total abortion ban while the state appeals a judge’s ruling that struck down the law.
The latest decision by District Judge Bruce Romanick means that, for now, his September ruling stands while the state appeals it to the North Dakota Supreme Court.
No abortion clinics have operated in North Dakota since the Red River Women’s Clinic moved from Fargo to nearby Moorhead, Minnesota, in 2022. The move came after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, triggering a North Dakota law that would have automatically banned most abortions. The statute was about to take effect when the clinic sued to stop it.
North Dakota’s abortion ban made performing the procedure a felony. The only exceptions were to prevent the mother’s death or a “serious health risk” to her. In cases of rape or incest, a patient could secure an abortion up to six weeks of gestation, which is before some people realize they are pregnant.
“The Court has found the law unconstitutional under the state constitution,” Romanick said. “It would be non-sensical for this Court to keep a law it has found to be unconstitutional in effect pending appeal.”
The newest decision is important because it means people with serious pregnancy complications who go to hospitals seeking medical care don’t have to worry about their treatment being delayed under the law, said Meetra Mehdizadeh, staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, who also is an attorney for the plaintiffs.
“It just makes pregnancy safer for everyone to know that if that does happen, they will have the option of being able to seek that care in-state and won’t have to worry that their doctors are going to feel forced to delay care or that their doctors are not going to be able to provide standard-of-care treatment because of the law,” she said.
Last month, the judge found North Dakota’s abortion ban unconstitutionally vague, and ruled that pregnant women in the state have a fundamental right to abortion before a fetus is viable outside the womb.
The state plans to appeal that September ruling.
A text message was sent to North Dakota Attorney General Drew Wrigley Thursday seeking comment about whether the state would also appeal Romanick’s most recent decision.
The judge heard arguments Thursday morning from attorneys representing the state and the abortion rights plaintiffs, including the women’s clinic and several physicians.
In court, Special Assistant Attorney General Dan Gaustad said the September ruling raises questions and creates confusion about what it means for dozens of state’s attorneys not named in the lawsuit and for other district court judges.
“Let’s let the North Dakota Supreme Court decide this issue and let the law remain in place like it has been,” Gaustad said.
Melissa Rutman, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said the state hadn’t met the requirements to stay the ruling that struck down the abortion ban.
“The court already concluded that there is confusion if the law is in effect because as a matter of law, the law is too vague on its face to afford doctors due process rights, and physicians are forced to guess whether their medical decisions will subject them to criminal liability,” she said.
The judge also said his previous order and judgment “are not confusing.”
veryGood! (9389)
Related
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Israeli delegation attends UN heritage conference in Saudi Arabia in first public visit by officials
- For Deion Sanders and Shedeur Sanders, Colorado's defeat of Nebraska was 'personal'
- Federal railroad inspectors find alarming number of defects on Union Pacific this summer
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Cowboys QB Dak Prescott's new tattoo honors late mom
- Appeals court reduces restrictions on Biden administration contact with social media platforms
- GOP threat to impeach a Wisconsin Supreme Court justice is driven by fear of losing legislative edge
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- GA grand jury recommended charges against 3 senators, NY mayor's migrant comments: 5 Things podcast
Ranking
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- South Korean media: North Korean train presumably carrying leader Kim Jong Un departed for Russia
- Morocco earthquake live updates: Aftershock rocks rescuers as death toll surpasses 2,000
- With Rubiales finally out, Spanish soccer ready to leave embarrassing chapter behind
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Ralph Lauren makes lavish NYFW comeback at show with JLo, Diane Keaton, Sofia Richie, more
- Stranded American caver arrives at base camp 2,300 feet below ground
- No. 10 Texas had nothing to fear from big, bad Alabama in breakthrough victory
Recommendation
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
5 former London police officers admit sending racist messages about Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, other royals
Here's how to ask for a letter of recommendation (and actually get a good one.)
Ja'Marr Chase on trash talk after Bengals' loss to Browns: 'We just lost to some elves'
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Federal railroad inspectors find alarming number of defects on Union Pacific this summer
'Good Morning America' host Robin Roberts marries Amber Laign in 'magical' backyard ceremony
Novak Djokovic wins US Open, adding to record number of men's singles Grand Slam titles